Meeting
with Coach
Kate
and I discussed the various conversational roles I sought to explore during the
week. I shared that I am most comfortable
as a mover and bystander, using the latter to facilitate the former. So during the
week I tried out being a follower and an opposer.
Kate
helped me see that during my attempt at being an opposer, I had failed to
properly charge the container. Going into the conversation I had assumed that
the relationship I had with the person was enough charge to create a
productive, or at least functional, charge, but I had been mistaken. Kate encouraged
me to take more care in that regard, especially when opposing in field 2.
We
also discussed my interpretation of following. I have to admit, my take on it
was neither what Olen or Kate laid out as a productive form of following. In
class online, Olen mentioned that following is a way to open doors in
conversation, and Kate shared how she uses following as a way to close out a
topic in a conversation so the discussion can move forward. I had interpreted following
as offering validation to others within the dialogue. I think now that there is
room for all three interpretations, and an awareness of what is happening
within individuals, as well as in between them, is key to knowing how to apply
followership in a given moment. I’m very glad for both Olen’s and Kate’s
contribution to my understanding because my view of it was quite limited.
No comments:
Post a Comment